Area53 banner which is a collection of lots of scattered pictures of things the blogger likes, from music artists and films to TV shows.


From the Past

Films on the to-do list

  • Armageddon Time
  • Black Widow
  • Chimes at Midnight
  • The Killing of a Sacred Deer
  • Last Christmas
  • Remember Sunday
  • Shazam! 2
  • Thor: Love and Thunder
  • Spy Guys

The Illusionist (2006)

Film review: The Illusionist (2006), directed by Neil Burger

Austria, late 1800s or early 1900s. A cabinet maker’s son befriends, and falls in love with, a young duchess. They’re found out and forced apart. Years later, when the cabinet maker’s son, whose name is Eisenheim (Edward Norton), is all grown up and has travelled around and learned the secrets of illusionism that he didn’t know as a love-struck teenager, he meets the duchess, Sophie (Jessica Biel), again.

Sophie is engaged to Crown Prince Leopold (Rufus Sewell), a man known not to treat his women kindly. Sparks fly between Sophie and Eisenheim, and it’s not long before they plan on running away together. Problem is, the Crown Prince is not going to let his would-be wife run off with someone else, and because he’s royalty he’s free to do as he likes. Who would be so foolish as to dare accuse him of murder?

Also starring Paul Giamatti as Inspector Uhl and Eddie Marsan as Eisenheim’s manager.

I’m always fascinated when Hollywood produces two films on similar themes at the same time. Armageddon and Deep Impact spring to mind, as do Antz and A Bug’s Life, but there’s also The Illusionist and The Prestige. Both are set in similar time periods, and both are about illusionists, love and murder. Unfortunately though, when there are two films with similar ideas they will always be compared to each other and one will inevitably come out on top. In this case, it’s not The Illusionist.

It’s illusionism, a little bit of a ghost story and definitely a mystery, all rolled up in period drama and tied off with a little bit of magic. It’s good, but it’s not particularly surprising. It’s very interesting, and has a great feel of the period in it, but I didn’t find it particularly engaging. The Prince is a privileged jerk who doesn’t want to share his toys, so to speak, and has an inspector stalking Eisenheim and who wants to know the secret of one of Eisenheim’s magic tricks.

It’s all a bit “okay, yeah, whatever” over the film. It’s well done and everything, and the would-be séances are an intriguing idea (some sort of projection, I presume?), but it’s nevertheless a film I’d probably record only to realise that it seems very familiar when watching it – because I’d forgotten that I’ve seen it before.

Still, The Illusionist has some interesting ideas, passes the time and there are worse ways that can be done. And let’s be honest – the period costumes and settings are fabulous.

3.4 out of 5 missing gems.


An easily distracted and over-excited introvert who never learns to go to bed at a reasonable time. Enjoys traveling (when there's not a plague on), and taking photos of European architecture. Cares for cats, good coffee and Boardwalk Empire. A child of her time, she did media studies in school and still can't decide what she wants to be when she grows up.

Let us know what you think!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.