Area53 banner which is a collection of lots of scattered pictures of things the blogger likes, from music artists and films to TV shows.


From the Past

Films on the to-do list

  • Armageddon Time
  • Black Widow
  • Chimes at Midnight
  • The Killing of a Sacred Deer
  • Last Christmas
  • Remember Sunday
  • Shazam! 2
  • Thor: Love and Thunder
  • Spy Guys

Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003)

Film review: Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003), directed by Peter Weir

With a title that makes it sound like it’s part two of a trilogy or something like that, Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World is a seafaring epic from director Peter Weir (Dead Poets Society, one of my all-time favourite films), starring Russell Crowe as Captain Jack Aubrey. Set in the early 1800s, the admirable Captain Aubrey runs a British Navy ship set out to conquer a French warship. With him, he has a collection of men of all ages – including some that have hardly hit their teens.

I really should’ve written this as soon as I saw the film, because now I can’t remember who on earth the people whose names I wrote down were. Ho hum.

The film opens with the British ship spotting the French ship and I thought “well, that’s what the info-button says it’s about – is this going to be a three-hour battle at sea?” Not quite.

There’s a bit of battle, sure, but there’s also a lot of trying to figure out how to take down the opponent, repairing the ship after battle, and how to find time for the doctor (Paul Bettany) to get ashore to study the wildlife of the Galapagos Islands. It’s a character-driven story more than anything, and you get a good feel for what it was possibly like to be aboard a ship back in those days. How there are days when there is no wind and other days when there is nothing but wind – and rain, and thunder and falling overboard and being swept away.

Master and Commander (sod the full title) is not a film to sea [sic!] (pun intended) if you’re afraid of water. There’s lots and lots of it. But that’s what I like about it. The sea, the ship, the sails – it’s intoxicating. Just a shame you can’t smell the briny seas or the tar – but on the other hand, perhaps a relief not having to smell the sweat and blood and cannon fire.

There’s very little you see of the French crew; it’s almost as if it’s a ghost ship, but since this isn’t Pirates of the Caribbean, the ship is not a phantom at all. There is some well-played and really stupid superstition, which ultimately leads to tragedy, but there are no pirates come to say ARRRR. Which is a shame, in a way, because with all these great-looking old ships darting about the Seven Seas and not one pirate. There are some whalers instead, but that’s not the same.

If you want an action-packed film about battles on the High Seas, perhaps you should look elsewhere. This is more about life on a ship in the early 1800s as opposed to a war epic. It’s vastly more human, and that’s what I like about it. Very enjoyable and I do like Peter Weir as a director as well. He seems to pick his films to be profoundly touching, in one way or another. While the plot of chasing the French is forgettable, the story of the supposedly “cursed” sailor will stay with me, along with the thought that they let boys who barely look like they’ve hit puberty serve in the navy. How times have changed.

3.8 out of 5 cannon balls.


An easily distracted and over-excited introvert who never learns to go to bed at a reasonable time. Enjoys traveling (when there's not a plague on), and taking photos of European architecture. Cares for cats, good coffee and Boardwalk Empire. A child of her time, she did media studies in school and still can't decide what she wants to be when she grows up.

4 thoughts on “Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003)

  1. The first time I saw this was in the theater when my kids dragged me to see “The most fantastic movie, Mom!!” Between the noise of the sea, the accents, and my slight hearing loss, I missed a lot of the details of the movie, and even found myself falling asleep only to awaken during a heartbreaking and pivotal scene. (Luckily, we were at the Dollar Movie, so I didn’t totally waste my money).

    The next time I saw it we had bought the DVD and I could use the subtitles, and I totally fell in love with this movie. Even though it is totally macho and devoid of a woman’s touch, it has become one of my favorites. I watch it frequently, just because it is so exciting and yet makes you care about each character on a personal level. I still haven’t gotten over the death of one of the most appealing characters. (I will say no more about that….).

    I also love the soundtrack, which I have just been listening to this week. I’ve found #13,”The Battle”, a fitting and inspiring accompaniment to rush-hour driving in my city, which is small as cities go, but full of people almost entirely devoid of basic driving skills.

  2. It is undeniably a sausage fest, but I think there’s not much that would “cure” it, because war ships simply weren’t a place for women in those days. To put a woman on the ship just to make up the numbers wouldn’t have worked, and to introduce a plotline of a woman in a port somewhere could potentially also have ruined it. At least there was a reason for women not being in this film, unlike The Hobbit

    The surroundings while watching a film are very important. If you can’t make out what people are saying, for one reason or another, you’re never going to be really engrossed in the storyline. It’s good that they have subtitles on DVDs – makes it so much easier. Think I know which scenes/characters you’re getting at as well. 🙂

Let us know what you think!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.